Making RAG Production-Ready: Overcoming Common Challenges with Solutions

Read Time: 7 minutes

 Follow us : 

Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked a revolution in how users engage with and generate content, driving significant interest in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). This technology empowers users to develop applications like chatbots, document search tools, workflow agents, and conversational assistants using LLMs with their proprietary data.

While setting up basic RAG systems is straightforward, transitioning to production-level RAG presents numerous challenges. AI engineers encounter parameters and potential failure points at every stage of development, necessitating innovative solutions to bring their applications to fruition. This blog aims to explore the challenges and remedies in constructing production-ready RAG systems while providing insights into the future evolution of this architecture. 

What is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)? and Its Importance?   

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a method that enhances the capabilities of language models by integrating them with external data sources. The RAG stack consists of two primary components: data parsing and injection, and data querying. 

1. Data Parsing and Injection: This involves processing unstructured documents, chunking, and embedding the data into a storage system, typically a vector database. Examples of vector databases include Pinecone, VVA, and Chroma. 

2. Data Querying: Once the data is stored, it can be queried to retrieve relevant context, which is then used in prompts to synthesize responses. This process allows LLMs to generate accurate responses on specific data 

The developer can retrieve information from an existing database, integrate that context into specific prompts, and generate a synthesized response. This process enables the developer to quickly create a basic version of a search or chat GPT-like experience using your data. 

Challenges of industrialization   

While it is relatively straightforward to prototype a basic RAG pipeline, scaling it for production use is challenging. If you have a document containing 10k words or an annual report, you're essentially searching for specific information within this extensive knowledge base. In such cases, simple RAG works quite effectively, however, it often fails when dealing with more complex queries or larger data volumes. The challenges include: 

• Handling Multi-Part Questions: More complex queries may require combining information from multiple sources. 
• Scalability: As the number of documents increases, performance tends to degrade. 
• Parameter Tuning: There are numerous parameters in the RAG pipeline, each affecting the overall system performance. 

The following challenges can cause a degradation in user experience, occasionally resulting in instances where accurate answers prove elusive.  Users might face issues like bad retrieval, and hallucinations. Navigating through this complexity presents a formidable task. 

Traditional Vs Generative AI powered Software 

Two fundamental challenges appear when the user wants to enhance the performance of an AI-powered system: subpar performance and a lack of clarity on how to improve the system. This scenario underscores the intricate nature of parameter optimization. 

In AI, the abundance of parameters throughout the development process can be staggering. From fine-tuning LLM models to configuring hyperparameters, developers are faced with a daunting task of navigating through a maze of variables to maximize the accuracy of their systems.  

To understand the difficulties in optimizing RAG pipelines, it is essential to compare traditional software development with AI-powered software development: 

• Traditional Software: Defined by programmatic rules, the expected output can be reasoned about relatively easily. As we know the internal functioning of the program, we can easily check what input will generate what output. While edge cases exist, they can be identified and managed through dry runs. 

• AI-Powered Software: An AI model often functions as a black box because its internal workings are opaque. While software doesn't have to rely entirely on LLMs, their presence in the pipeline turns the whole system into a black box. Consequently, we can't predict how changes in parameters or hyperparameters will affect the output. 

The complexities of parameter tuning become more evident in AI-powered software development. For instance, using a LLM for text generation involves pre-trained data, but the outputs are unpredictable, acting like a black box. Each new parameter adds to the system's complexity and impacts performance unpredictably. 

An AI model is essentially a black box defined by its parameters, which are hard to visualize in high-dimensional spaces. While gradient descent optimizes model parameters, surrounding parameters in an inference setting remain untuned. Using an LLM, the prompt template is a hyperparameter that hasn't been tuned. 

In AI-powered systems, as the AI model is a black box, the entire system becomes one. For example, an LLM's opaque parameters, combined with additional parameters in a complex system like a RAG pipeline, create a larger black box, making it hard to understand how each parameter affects overall performance. Even simple parameters like chunk size add to this complexity. 

RAG challenges and solutions:

• Common Pain Points in RAG Pipelines 

Normally, a developer writes code and can predict what the program will do. With LLM, it's more like a black box. Developers train the model on data, but how it arrives at an answer can be a mystery. This gets even trickier when we combine AI models with other software components. 

So how do we build reliable software with these mysterious AI components? The good news is, there are solutions being developed. One approach is to identify common challenges, or "pain points," that developers face when building with AI. A lot of the pain points that users face in building RAG can be seen as response quality related.  Basically, a lot of the issues boil down to, user asking a question and not getting back the result.  By understanding these challenges, experts can propose best practices to make the process smoother. Here are some challenges you might face:  

1. Missing Context in the Knowledge Base: Sometimes, the data needed to answer a query is not available or is poorly formatted. Solutions include using high-quality document parsers and adding relevant metadata to chunks of text to improve the embedding model's understanding. 

2. Context missing in Initial Retrieving Pass: If the relevant context is not retrieved, it could be due to poorly tuned hyperparameters like top K value (the size of the context window). Increasing the top K value temporarily can help debug if the context is being retrieved at all. Additionally, re-ranking the retrieved results can improve accuracy. 

3. Context missing after re-ranking: There are also cases where even after dense retrieval, re-ranking might still not give back the relevant context. In such cases, it is important to use sophisticated retrieval methods, some of which are unique to LLMs. 

4. Context Not Extracted: This limitation is highlighted in "needle in the haystack" experiments, where random facts are injected into prompts, making it difficult for the LLM to discern relevant information. 

5. Output is in Wrong Format: A common concern in building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Large Language Model (LLM) applications is the output format, particularly the expectation for structured JSON output 

6. Output is Incomplete: When dealing with complex multi-part questions, the limitations of simple Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) become apparent. While simple RAG is effective for answering straightforward questions about specific facts, it often falls short when confronted with multi-part inquiries. In such cases, even with the top K RAG approach, the retrieved context may be insufficient to fully address the question at hand. 

7. Complex Document Processing: Handling complex documents such as PDFs with embedded tables or charts requires specialized parsers. Ensuring the correct parsing and chunking strategies can significantly impact the performance of the RAG pipeline. 

8. Optimizing for Different Query Types: Different types of queries might require different retrieval strategies. For instance, handling tabular data might need a different approach compared to unstructured text. 

9. Handling Large Scale Data: As the volume of data increases, ensuring efficient retrieval and processing becomes critical. This may involve distributed systems and more sophisticated retrieval algorithms. 

•  Solutions and Best Practice

As the RAG pipeline evolves, some of the advanced techniques and best practices have been identified to address these pain points effectively are: 

1. Metadata Enrichment: Adding metadata to chunks of text helps the embedding model and the LLM understand the context better. This includes annotations about the document's origin, relevance, and other pertinent information. 

2. Keep your data updated: In production, data sources update frequently. It is important to set up a recurring data ingestion pipeline so that we can properly process new updates over time.  Upsert (Update and Insert) documents to prevent duplicates. 

3. Adaptive Retrieval Strategies: Implementing advanced retrieval strategies that go beyond simple K retrieval can enhance performance. For instance, we can decouple chunks used for embedding versus chunks used for the LLM and use the LLM to do query planning. Other retrieval methods may include small-to-big, auto-merging, auto-retrieval, ensembling.  

4. Query Planning and Reasoning: Using the LLM for query planning and reasoning allows for more sophisticated retrieval methods, leveraging the model's ability to understand and process complex queries. 

5. Fine-tuning the embedding models to task-specific data: Consider fine-tuning a model when we possess a substantial training set, particularly relevant for enterprises struggling with retrieving results from vast domain-specific data repositories. 

6. Prompt Compression and Context Reordering: Prompt compression aims to condense context to reduce token cost and latency while maintaining retrieval quality. Context reordering involves ranking context chunks by relevance, ensuring that the most pertinent information is prioritized for better model performance. 

7. Add agentic Reasoning: There's a growing interest in enhancing basic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches with agentic reasoning capabilities. This aims to tackle complex questions by breaking them down into smaller parts, facilitating the resolution of longer tasks and ambiguous research problems. It requires incorporating various components, from query planning and execution to utilizing tools and other data sources. 

8. Continuous Evaluation and Feedback: Regularly evaluating the RAG pipeline with a set of benchmark queries and updating the parameters based on feedback helps maintain performance. This includes adjusting chunk sizes of input data, retrieval methods, and re-ranking algorithms. 

9. Scalability Solutions: Implementing distributed systems and ensuring efficient data processing pipelines are crucial for handling large-scale data. Techniques like sharding and parallel processing can be employed. 

Conclusion 

Building production-ready RAG pipelines is a complex but rewarding journey. By understanding and addressing the common pain points, developers can create robust and efficient systems capable of handling a wide range of queries and data types.  

In the future, these models are poised to become more agentic, evolving beyond their current capabilities. Large Language Models (LLMs) will transition from one-shot reasoning to executing repeated sequences of actions. They will adeptly navigate complex issues, conducting search retrieval operations and taking proactive actions on behalf of the user. 

Continuous innovation and best practices in the field will further enhance the capabilities and performance of RAG pipelines, paving the way for more sophisticated and intelligent Generative AI applications. 

To learn more, book a call now!

Sources:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.05856,,  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRhXoEXhWAM